Titlebook: Disaster Policy Implementation; Managing Programs un Peter J. May,Walter Williams Book 1986 Plenum Press, New York 1986 Governance.Nation.P

occurrence

粗鄙的人

Strategisches W?hlen in Deutschlandlity in implementation experiences. First, there are the commonalities and differences among different modes of shared governance. Each of the programs we have considered involves active federal governance in that the federal government is not just a source of funds. For each program there is signif

ALIAS

Bouquet

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8401-2as been guided by the results of earlier implementation studies, most of which focused on social policies. In this chapter, we explore the extent to which our findings concerning disaster policy implementation correspond with those of the earlier studies about social policies. This comparison serves

娘娘腔

considerable

ion of disaster policy implementation allow us: (I) to analyze the implementation of selected aspects of disaster policy and to discuss federal management choices in this area; (2) to gain a greater understanding of federal program implementation under "shared governance"-a term we develop more fully in the b978-1-4612-9270-8978-1-4613-2153-8

廚師

Disaster Policy in Perspectivees, and a small river named the Toutle turns into a raging torrent of force sufficient to crash through bridges and dams. In such a disaster, people and institutions are mobilized, ranging from local police and state troopers possibly even to the president of the United States who upon the request o

micronutrients

使苦惱

整頓

Case Study Design chapter addresses our research design for applying these concepts to the study of disaster policy implementation. We begin with our rationale for thinking of disaster policy in terms of shared governance, then consider the selection of the four federal emergency management programs that illustrate