Titlebook: Disability Services and Disability Studies in Higher Education: History, Contexts, and Social Impact; Christy M. Oslund Book 2015 Christy

風(fēng)俗習(xí)慣

書目名稱Disability Services and Disability Studies in Higher Education: History, Contexts, and Social Impact影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Disability Services and Disability Studies in Higher Education: History, Contexts, and Social Impact影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Disability Services and Disability Studies in Higher Education: History, Contexts, and Social Impact網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Disability Services and Disability Studies in Higher Education: History, Contexts, and Social Impact網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Disability Services and Disability Studies in Higher Education: History, Contexts, and Social Impact被引頻次




書目名稱Disability Services and Disability Studies in Higher Education: History, Contexts, and Social Impact被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Disability Services and Disability Studies in Higher Education: History, Contexts, and Social Impact年度引用




書目名稱Disability Services and Disability Studies in Higher Education: History, Contexts, and Social Impact年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Disability Services and Disability Studies in Higher Education: History, Contexts, and Social Impact讀者反饋




書目名稱Disability Services and Disability Studies in Higher Education: History, Contexts, and Social Impact讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Affection

cruise

BUMP

Disability Services and Higher Education,ing social movement would also work to change dominant social views about accessibility. As laws changed universities found themselves dealing with students they were unprepared for while also under new legal mandates to make educational settings accessible. The Disability Services field grew from a

Aviary

Disability Studies and Higher Education,he concerns as voiced by people with disabilities. As those with disabilities fought to speak on their own behalf, their concerns were naturally brought into classrooms where they were teaching and also raised by allies in teaching contexts. Professionalization of the field included development of g

討好美人

討好美人

Potential Impact of Intentional Interaction and Coalition Forming, and one from JPED to show specific examples of how each field frames specific concerns; how does the conversation within and between fields change when each field adopts something of the viewpoint of the other? What questions grow out of dialogue that are less likely to be produced by the fields wo

hermitage

infarct

Customary

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34675-1ntly of each other; the obstacles inherent in the working/professional environment; some of the obstacles that stand between greater collaboration between the fields. Foregrounds the idea that generations of social practices and beliefs both necessitated the development of each feld and led to them being two distinct fields.