Titlebook: Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions; Shaun Bowler,Amihai Glazer Book 2008 Shaun Bowler and Amihai Glazer 2008 cam

Prehypertension

書目名稱Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions被引頻次




書目名稱Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions年度引用




書目名稱Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions讀者反饋




書目名稱Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

招致

Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions978-0-230-61202-0

悶熱

legislate

斜谷

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02661-4 democracy is that the direct democracy process weakens political parties, thereby undercutting not just their role in modern democracy but also some of the central pillars of representative democracy itself (Broder 2000, see also Schrag 1998).

詞匯記憶方法

詞匯記憶方法

,“Hybrid Democracy” and Its Consequences,arguments. Some aspects of direct democracy, such as voting behavior, are reasonably well understood, whereas other aspects, such as how parties are shaped by direct democracy or what direct democracy means for governability, are poorly understood. The chapters in this volume further our understanding of these important yet understudied areas.

N防腐劑

Direct Democracy and the Public Agenda: Ballot Initiatives and Public Beliefs about Important Probllegislation boosts the civic life of states by increasing political interest (Tolbert and Bowen, this volume), participation (Smith 2001; Smith and Tolbert 2004), political knowledge (Pantoja and Segura 2003; Smith 2002), and political efficacy (Bowler and Donovan 2002).

prosperity

急急忙忙

Direct Democracy and the Stability of State Policy,bility. That is, initiatives may act as “veto points,” disrupting logrolling coalitions, and thus leading to stability of policy. This chapter empirically tests these two competing hypotheses, using expenditure data from U.S. states from 1980 through 2002.