Titlebook: Direct Democracy and Minorities; Wilfried Marxer (Political Scientist, Directors) Book 2012 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer

終端

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3614-6used to decide the status of a given territory, can often exacerbate such conflicts. I conclude that if such a referendum is held in deeply divided societies in which state institutions are weak and the state’s capacity to maintain a monopoly over the use of force is challenged, there is a high risk

身心疲憊

反省

Library of Philosophy and Religionnts of the overall system of political decision-making, which regulates the interaction between direct and representative democracy: There are mechanisms for safeguarding the rights of the political minorities on both the input and output sides of the referendum process. On the input side, the Natio

Assemble

emulsify

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73730-0 more effective if courts applied both a comprehensive pre-election review and stricter standards of review with regard to more minority groups, and if constitutional initiatives required a 2/3 majority for passage. Further safeguards are to be recommended. If direct legislation is designed in such

變形詞

粘連

Independence, Islamism, and Modernityhe Jura conflict as an example of how direct democracy has worked in practice. In the course of the Jura conflict direct democracy turned out to be an indispensable tool of conflict regulation, and indeed conflict resolution, which is still ongoing. In describing the events emphasis is placed on the

性行為放縱者

Systemic

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027504ebiscitary politics in European integration. A case study on the 2004 pledges of the British and French governments to put the European Constitution to a popular vote serves to provide some empirical evidence for these transnational dynamics at work.

側(cè)面左右