Titlebook: Dionysius Scytobrachion; Jeffrey S. Rusten Book 1982 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 1982 Apollon.Dissertation.Edition.Fragment.Index.Nero.P

Implicit

Overview: 978-3-663-05374-3978-3-663-05373-6

FOLD

意外的成功

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4424-3The progress of modern scholars in recovering the outlines of Dionysius’ . and . has already been described in the Introduction; we must now concern ourselves with several difficulties presented by the testimonia on these and other works, particularly by the . and the scholia to Apollonius of Rhodes.

Myosin

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01884-8For a determination of the date of Scytobrachion modern scholars have generally relied on a single testimonium (Suet. . 7 = T 3):

精致

完成

Dionysius’ WorksThe progress of modern scholars in recovering the outlines of Dionysius’ . and . has already been described in the Introduction; we must now concern ourselves with several difficulties presented by the testimonia on these and other works, particularly by the . and the scholia to Apollonius of Rhodes.

流眼淚

Dionysius’ DateFor a determination of the date of Scytobrachion modern scholars have generally relied on a single testimonium (Suet. . 7 = T 3):

Enrage

The ,In the preceding chapters reasons have been adduced for assigning part or all of three different papyri to the . of Dionysius of Mytilene, and for dating that work and the same author’s . to the period 270–220 B.C. It remains to examine the nature of these works themselves, and the literary traditions to which they belong.

POWER

Introductionms, including Dionysius’ date, are only mentioned briefly here; a full treatment of them is possible only after the evidence of the new fragments on papyrus has been evaluated, and it is therefore reserved for Part II, Chapters iv – vi below.

faculty

P. Mich. inv. 1316 versoby name, it seems unlikely that either is the main subject of the text. Lines 9–17 evidently contained an estimate of the arrangement .of a work (presumably on the Argonauts), but here too the precise subject is unclear, and perhaps there is a comparison between two works.