Titlebook: Difficult Decisions in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery; An Evidence-Based Ap J. Michael Millis,Jeffrey B. Matthews Book 2016 The Edito

有權(quán)

When Is Laparoscopic Liver Resection Preferred Over Open Resection?,val. Current evidence suggests that in well-selected patients, the long-term oncologic outcomes achieved with laparoscopic liver resection are equivalent to those obtained with open liver resection. To date, there are no published randomized trials comparing laparoscopic to open liver resection, although two trials are ongoing.

柔美流暢

螢火蟲

landfill

,Treatment Protocols for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma (≤3 cm): RFA or Resection?,may play a great role for the final decision. Our results showed that not all the patients with small HCC are applicable for RFA treatment, so as to say, resection may be more beneficial for patients with the nonboundary type of small HCC.

不能約

Early (<24 h) or Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis?,tion). There is a growing body of evidence from both retrospective reviews of large clinical databases and prospective randomized controlled trials to recommend early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) over delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC).

doxazosin

PALSY

哺乳動物

Gullible

Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approachhttp://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/278963.jpg

向下

Rechtsfolgen des Refinanzierungsregisterscomplete and inadequate evidence. The steps of searching for the evidence using the PICO format and an overview of the study design types which make up the body evidence will be discussed. A more detailed treatment of the GRADE system to make explicit the decisions on the quality of evidence and the