Titlebook: Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census; Who is Missed? William P.‘O’Hare Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

協(xié)議

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9479-0on-Hispanic White Alone population. Asians also had a relatively low omissions rate in the 2010 Census. The omissions rate for Asians Alone or in Combination (5.3%) was slightly higher than the rate for Non-Hispanic White Alone (3.8%). The Asian age/sex group with the highest net undercount rate was

Concrete

The How, When, and Why of Mathematics,pulation have high net undercount and omissions rates. The omissions rate for American Indians and Alaskan Natives Alone or in Combination was 7.6% which is double the rate for Non-Hispanic White Alone (3.8%). Also, Census coverage for American Indians and Alaskan Natives living on reservations was

上下倒置

保全

Fresco

放逐

Planning management control systemsapter and the relationship between net undercounts and omissions is reiterated. The importance of the Census is highlighted and ways in which readers can get involved in promoting a better 2020 Census are described here.

mortuary

William P.‘O’HareThis open access book provides an overview of which groups have the highest net undercounts and which groups have the higher undercount differentials in the US census.Discusses why census undercounts

nutrients

locus-ceruleus

Census Coverage of the Hispanic Population,opulation. The omissions rate for Hispanics (7.7%) was about twice the rate for Non-Hispanic White Alone (3.8%). Hispanic men age 18–49 had net undercount rates over 5% and omissions rates over 10% in the 2010 Census.

Antimicrobial