Titlebook: Differential Subject Marking; Helen Hoop,Peter Swart Book 20091st edition Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Nominativ.Syntax.aspec

intelligible

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6497-5Nominativ; Syntax; aspect; genitive; interaction; language; semantic; semantic features; subject

貞潔

978-90-481-2263-9Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

最高點(diǎn)

penance

Reactive Oxygen Species in Plantsthe topic NP anaphorically. The anaphoric pronoun is then reduced to a clitic-like element, while still retaining the pronominal content. It is then further reduced to a morphologically dependent affix, with the subsequent loss of the pronominal content to a mere agreement marker.

Capitulate

insipid

Pablo Duarte,Antonio Cuadrado,Rafael Leónnguages differentiate their subjects on the basis of the form, such as being a pronoun or not, others on the basis of semantic features such as being a real agent (volitional, in control) or not, and still others distinguish their subjects on the basis of clausal features such as tense/aspect/mood o

Thyroid-Gland

Pietro Ghezzi,Arshag D. Mooradianr in a different position than others. In a narrower sense, such differences are thought of as DSM effects only if they depend on the features of the subject in some way, and in the narrowest sense, DSM effects refer to situations in which only subjects with features toward the lower end of the Pers

jarring

Conclave

John F. Valentine,Harry S. Nick. The case to be discussed below is interesting and rather unusual since, unlike the cases of Partitive marking mentioned above, which are not restricted to just one particular verb, but, on the contrary, show quite a broad (but by no means unrestricted) distribution, the Polish case concerns exclus

amnesia