Titlebook: Dialogical Rhetoric; An Essay on Truth an Wouter H. Slob Book 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002 Argument.dialectic.dialog

Blandishment

書目名稱Dialogical Rhetoric影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Dialogical Rhetoric影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dialogical Rhetoric網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Dialogical Rhetoric網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dialogical Rhetoric被引頻次




書目名稱Dialogical Rhetoric被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dialogical Rhetoric年度引用




書目名稱Dialogical Rhetoric年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dialogical Rhetoric讀者反饋




書目名稱Dialogical Rhetoric讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

剛開始

Pelvic-Floor

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0476-3Argument; dialectic; dialogue; logic; postmodernism; rhetoric

拋物線

改良

緩解

Steven Burgess,Casey Rentmeesterthey had something to say about the concept of truth, said surprisingly little: they were far more interested in truths than in “truth”’ (Pitcher, 1964, 1). Pitcher suggests that the interest in theories of truth was triggered by the ‘a(chǎn)pparently outrageous things which the Absolute Idealists of the

緩解

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9442-8s yielding incompatible conclusions cannot be permitted. We have seen that pre-modern philosophy had no need to defend its (mono-)logic, but as soon as the modernist ’turn to the subject’ had its logical counterpart in the syntactical approach of Frege a problem emerged. Modern formal logic allowed

圍裙

Frank C. Richardson,Robert C. Bishopion is what accounts for such normative distinctions. As all of these distinctions are debatable (at least from a human perspective), we can see them as outcomes of discussions. We might therefore generalize the problem as a matter of evaluating arguments and concentrate on the distinction between g

FLING

enlist

Patrick Londen,Philip Walsh,Jeff Yoshiminormativity differs from a dialectical approach, as well as from a mono-logical one. The latter holds that there is only one logic that controls the correctness of inferences. I argued that mono-logic requires a strong understanding of truth, and I hope to have explained sufficiently that we should