Titlebook: Dialectics of the Concrete; A Study on Problems Karel Kosík Book 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1976 Europe.Interpr

cerebral

書目名稱Dialectics of the Concrete影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Dialectics of the Concrete影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dialectics of the Concrete網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Dialectics of the Concrete網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dialectics of the Concrete被引頻次




書目名稱Dialectics of the Concrete被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dialectics of the Concrete年度引用




書目名稱Dialectics of the Concrete年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dialectics of the Concrete讀者反饋




書目名稱Dialectics of the Concrete讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Simulate

0068-0346 . Starting with Marx‘s methodological approach, of "ascending from the abstract to the concrete", Kosik develops a critique of positivism, of phenomenalist empi978-94-010-1522-6978-94-010-1520-2Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942

cocoon

Onerous

Economics and Philosophy,ch investigation pretends to be something it is not. It claims to be scientific, yet it takes the most essential thing — the distinction between what is essential and what is peripheral — for granted and beyond investigating. It does not strive for the essential through a complex process of regressi

揭穿真相

Philosophy and Economy,h as value, falling rate of profit, surplus value, the processes of producing capital and surplus value, etc., does not usually ask about the overall meaning of Marx’s work. The question either never enters his mind, or he is satisfied with answering it with some general considerations in which comp

割公牛膨脹

割公牛膨脹

Archana B,V. Pavithra,Leena Dennis Josepht but also for a detour. Dialectical thinking therefore distinguishes between the idea of a thing and the concept of a thing, by which it understands not only two forms and two degrees of . of reality but above all two categories of human .. Man approaches reality primarily and immediately not as an

jet-lag

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0035-0ch investigation pretends to be something it is not. It claims to be scientific, yet it takes the most essential thing — the distinction between what is essential and what is peripheral — for granted and beyond investigating. It does not strive for the essential through a complex process of regressi

減震

Affirm

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8625-3 philosophy as substance,., Absolute Spirit, negativity, the thing-in-itself, etc. Without their philosophical problematique, these concepts would of course be empty. The historian who would sever solutions from problems would also transform the history of philosophy and of philosophical thinking in