Titlebook: Developing Positive Employment Relations; International Experi Stewart Johnstone,Adrian Wilkinson Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) a

縮寫

書目名稱Developing Positive Employment Relations影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Developing Positive Employment Relations影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Developing Positive Employment Relations網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Developing Positive Employment Relations網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Developing Positive Employment Relations被引頻次




書目名稱Developing Positive Employment Relations被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Developing Positive Employment Relations年度引用




書目名稱Developing Positive Employment Relations年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Developing Positive Employment Relations讀者反饋




書目名稱Developing Positive Employment Relations讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

江湖郎中

物種起源

Workplace Partnership in Ireland: Irreconcilable Tensions Between an ‘Irish Third Way’ of Voluntary . The two levels—national and workplace—are not mutually exclusive and interlink in important ways. National policy and institutions shape the context in which workplace-level cooperative arrangements are enacted and played out. Tripartite bargained consensus at a national level—involving government

Occipital-Lobe

Workplace Cooperation at Aughinish Aluminaorkplaces, but there needs to be meaningful re-distribution of decision-making power and workers (unions) have to have real independence from management. An implication of this is that partnership mechanisms involving trade unions tend to be more robust and facilitative of pluralist mutuality than n

ineptitude

The Kaiser Permanente Labour–Management Partnership: 1997–2013istory, covering over 100,000 employees, 10 different national unions, and 26 local unions in an industry, health care, that has been undergoing substantial change over the life of the partnership. Moreover, the parties turned around an organization that was losing substantial money and at risk of b

intricacy

Book 2016f the UK, Ireland, USA, Australia and New Zealand. .Developing Positive Employment Relations .assesses the conceptual debates, reviews the employment relations context in each of these countries, and provides workplace case studies of thedynamics of partnership at the enterprise level..

intricacy

PTCA635

Sara Anas Serafi,Kalliopi Fousekirgument, mainly using the evidence from the UK and Ireland, that partnership can be viewed as an attempt to develop social democratic–type industrial citizenship, similar to the continental “social dialogue” approach but within the constraints of the voluntarist employment relations systems of liber

智力高

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-3702-0siness sense to consider issues of both organisational efficiency and employee welfare. If we define partnership in terms of participation practices, however, then partnership can be traced to pluralist concerns around industrial democracy (Webb and Webb 1897) and the development of institutions of

Redundant

Corporate Governance in IT Companies. The two levels—national and workplace—are not mutually exclusive and interlink in important ways. National policy and institutions shape the context in which workplace-level cooperative arrangements are enacted and played out. Tripartite bargained consensus at a national level—involving government