Titlebook: Developing Countries in the WTO; Constantine Michalopoulos Book 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001 D

Immobilize

STENT

José Abdelnour-Nocera,Torkil Clemmensen their institutions to implement such policies and support their fuller integration into world trade. This increased emphasis on institutions partly reflects a more general shift in priorities in development thinking and practice. It also reflects specific concerns about the increased burdens placed

領(lǐng)帶

WHERE – Physical Entries to the Internetnt determinant of the overall demand for developing-country exports, increased at a slightly lower rate than the long-term growth trends in these countries — just under 2.0 per cent for 1990-99 compared with 2.2 per cent in the 1980s and 3.0 per cent in the 1970s (OECD, 2000). On the other hand, the

潔凈

K. C. Fung,Nathalie Aminian,Chris Y. Tunghe World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Many developing countries are party to these agreements and members of the WIPO; but many others are not, and the enforcement mechanisms for the agreements are weak.

OFF

休戰(zhàn)

Infirm

SPASM

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137444882s received increased attention since the conclusion of the Uruguay Round agreements (URA). The WTO agreement explicitly calls for collaboration between the new institution and the Bretton Woods institution; that is, the IMF and the World Bank (see Article III of the Agreement Establishing the WTO).

oxidant

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137444882 been in many ways impressive, but also very uneven. A small number of countries, perhaps 15–20, have made giant strides, both in their institutional integration into the WTO system and in terms of their ratio of trade to GDP.

aerial