Titlebook: Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research; John Forge Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Just War Theory.c

粗糙

MOCK

付出

Aviary

Juan I. Castrillo,Stephen G. Oliverterceptor aircraft left, but they had none, and the US air force was so confident of this that the planes sent to bomb the cities had no escorts. But there is no plausible defence, either in existence nor even really in theory, that can resist a sustained offensive with ICBMs. Nuclear weapons also d

天空

Toni Gabaldón,Marina Marcet-Houbened before we can begin to look at the most convincing justifications of WR, and I will explain what these are in Sect. 6.1 of what follows. Most of the balance of the chapter will be devoted to one of these issues, namely to the choice of a code or system of morality, which will be used to support t

Bronchial-Tubes

Iuliana V. Ene,Alistair J. P. Brown “using a product of the Manhattan Project to bomb on Hiroshima” – although those descriptions might not apply, owing to restrictions imposed by the Limits Principle. But this does suggest a general way of describing WR, one that takes account of a property of all weapons, namely, that they are the

NATAL

Ekaterina Shelest,Kerstin Voigt deter or perhaps reduce harms. If there are, then S can claim that the weapons she was designing when her country, or another friendly state, was under attack, or threat of attack, were defensive, designed to prevent harm to her fellow citizens. But granted that the weapons are ‘inherently defensiv

白楊魚

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7804-5tively, and to make some simplifications and generalisations. We have in place a method for deciding when a violation of a moral rule is (weakly or strongly) justified, and we have seen that engaging in WR is to violate a moral rule. What we need to do now is to apply this method to the question of

眼界

Blastomycosis and Phaeohyphomycosisto ancient Greece. It is not surprising that there has been a long-standing tradition of thinking about how war can be just, given that war has been such a perennial feature of human history. Surely all wars cannot be bad, for, if they are, then does this not condemn all the societies and states tha

extrovert

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06088-6e main academic field for the study of war in the modern world, where the prevailing view is ., sometimes called . or power politics. And I said that this perspective is relevant to the present inquiry, because it provides an alternative way of looking at war, and (hence) at WR. One of the conclusio