Titlebook: Derrida and Textual Animality; For a Zoogrammatolog Rodolfo Piskorski Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl

tangle

,Animal Supplementarity in Lispector’s ,ki reads the flicker in the novel between the two variants of the Portuguese expression for ‘giving birth’ as indicative of a Derridean paleonym that critiques common understandings of animal embodiment.

Left-Atrium

2634-6338 ppeals to scholars interested in human-animal relationships .Derrida and Textual Animality: For a Zoogrammatology of Literature?.analyses what has come to be known, in the Humanities, as ‘the question of the animal’, in relation to literary texts. Rodolfo Piskorski intervenes in the current debate r

OCTO

FECT

Grundlagen zum Schneideneingriff, emergence of totemism is presented by Freud as the shift from nature to culture, and this strange temporality of this passage is explained by Derrida by means of ., a concept from Freud himself. Finally, Piskorski addresses the concept of the arche-animal in its relationship to materiality and ideation in more detail.

放牧

讓步

Animal as Text, Text as Animal: On the Matter of Textuality,n a thinking of the body. The discussion then focuses on Derrida by revisiting his early writings on Husserl where he exposes the similarities between language and animality, and concludes by discussing how Derrida’s deconstruction of the linguistic sign and introduction of the . opens a space for thinking the animal differently.

Spartan

The Arche-Animal: Totemic Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis, emergence of totemism is presented by Freud as the shift from nature to culture, and this strange temporality of this passage is explained by Derrida by means of ., a concept from Freud himself. Finally, Piskorski addresses the concept of the arche-animal in its relationship to materiality and ideation in more detail.

手榴彈

faucet

Introduction,hropocentrism by privileging animal being for their supposed materiality. Contrary to that, he outlines a more nuanced Derridean approach that skirts anthropocentrism while also rejecting a facile materiality of ‘real animals’ which threatens to neutralise the relevance of literary studies as a disc

殺菌劑

Animal as Text, Text as Animal: On the Matter of Textuality,h a strategy’s inadvertent admission of the constitutive powers of language in literature’s attempt to grapple with embodiment. Next, he discusses in more detail the co-implicated character of language and materiality and offers a critique of some interventions in Animal Studies and their reliance o