Titlebook: Dependency Structures and Lexicalized Grammars; An Algebraic Approac Marco Kuhlmann Book 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010 comput

喧鬧

男生如果明白

Mahmoud Abdelgawad,Indrakshi Rayerarchies of ever more powerful ., and classify several grammar formalisms with respect to the languages in these hierarchies that they are able to characterize. Our results show that the generative capacity and the parsing complexity of lexicalized grammar formalisms can be systematically related t

echnic

Managing Distrust in Law and Politicsa tutorial presentation. The reader is invited to browse through these preliminaries and return to them whenever some notation or terminology is unclear..Our formal toolbox is composed from four main sources: The terminology for mathematical structures and the relations between these structures come

overshadow

Data (In)Security: The Imperative of Trustals for formal constraints to restrict this relation. In this chapter, we study the best-known of these proposals, .. We start by reviewing three standard characterizations of projectivity (Section 3.1), and then introduce a new, algebraic characterization (Section 3.2). This gives rise to an effici

chiropractor

脫落

Giulia Wally Scurati,Marco Bertonie of possible values. In this chapter, we study ., a property related not to the degree, but to the form of non-projectivity in dependency structures. To motivate the well-nestedness restriction, we first look at another structural constraint, ., and investigate its entanglement with the block-degre

修飾

把…比做

Maria Spadafora,Mario Rapaccini,Shaun Westfically, we study the connection between these two measures and the structural constraints discussed in the first part of this book..We start by explaining how regular dependency grammars can be extended to generators of sets of strings (Section 8.1). We then show that, for the string languages gene

營養(yǎng)

Lipoprotein(A)