Titlebook: Deontic Logic in Computer Science; 10th International C Guido Governatori,Giovanni Sartor Conference proceedings 2010 Springer-Verlag Berli

Hermit

書目名稱Deontic Logic in Computer Science影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Deontic Logic in Computer Science影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deontic Logic in Computer Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Deontic Logic in Computer Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deontic Logic in Computer Science被引頻次




書目名稱Deontic Logic in Computer Science被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deontic Logic in Computer Science年度引用




書目名稱Deontic Logic in Computer Science年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deontic Logic in Computer Science讀者反饋




書目名稱Deontic Logic in Computer Science讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

繞著哥哥問

變色龍

Towards a Logical Analysis of the Judgment on Facts,rts) is the judgment about the facts in issue. In a sense, actually, judicial decisions derive from a sort of combination of legal and factual judgments. Lawyers -and logicians- usually deal with the . dimension of these decisions and analyze the features and the structure of legal arguments and of

領(lǐng)袖氣質(zhì)

dapper

A Dyadic Operator for the Gradation of Desirability,ss to the logic, it allows both the definition of a monadic desirability operator similar to the SDL obligation, and the expression of the relative level of desirability of target formulae. The interpretation of this logic on a linear structure of worlds ordered by desirability makes its semantics m

relieve

Deontics = Betterness + Priority,perties (i.e., a ‘law’ explicitly representing a standard of behavior). The correspondence between these two orderings offers a rich perspective from which to look at deontic scenarios and puzzles, and in particular at contrary-to-duties. The framework naturally lends itself to describing dynamics i

relieve

Axioms for Obligation and Robustness with Temporal Logic,rs, which quantify over failure-free paths and paths with one more failure respectively. This paper gives an axiomatisation for all the operators of RoCTL* with the exception of the Until operator; this fragment is able to express similar contrary-to-duty obligations to the full RoCTL* logic. We cal

grudging

HUSH

Relevance, Derogation and Permission,problem with the underlying full-meet contraction operation. We suggest a solution that presupposes a particular normal form for codes of norms, adapted from the theory of relevance through propositional letter sharing. We then establish a correspondence between contractions on sets of norms in inpu

cognizant

Retroactive Legal Changes and Revision Theory in Defeasible Logic,l dynamics. In particular, we showed that these techniques are not suitable when legal changes are retroactive. This suggested to adopt a different logical model able to express two main timelines, one internal to a given temporal version of the legal system, and another relative to how the legal sy