Titlebook: Deontic Logic and Normative Systems; 12th International C Fabrizio Cariani,Davide Grossi,Xavier Parent Conference proceedings 2014 Springer

偽造者

President Fujimori and the Capture of Guzmanr, their study exhibits a polarity between (i) norms as behavioural patterns emerging from repeated agents’ (inter)actions and (ii) norms as explicit prescriptions. In this paper, we attempt to build a bridge between these two conceptual poles of norms: it takes the form of a mental function for pre

LEVY

初次登臺

President Fujimori and the Capture of Guzmanexhaustive alternatives. This kind of theory can solve puzzles that face other linguistic theories of ‘ought’, via the rejection or severe restriction of principles that let us make inferences between ‘ought’ claims. By rejecting or restricting these principles, however, the contrastivist takes on a

鎮(zhèn)壓

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376472icity cases. These are modeled by means of argumentative attacks. For this, we adopt a recently proposed framework for logical argumentation in which arguments are generated by a sequent calculus of a given base logic (see[1]), and use standard deontic logic as our base logic. Argumentative attacks

tolerance

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0970-1utput of the constitutive norms are intermediate facts used as input for the regulative norms. The second method is called throughput, and adds the input of the constitutive norms to the intermediate facts. The third method is called reusable throughput, because it reuses the output of the regulativ

雪崩

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0970-1tly present in society in the form of moral or social rules; (ii) specific norms, i.e., duties of particular agents in particular situations. Norms of the two kinds refer to obligatory, permitted and forbidden actions or states. In the paper we start from presenting a simple deontic logic of actions

flex336

NATTY

縮影

錢財(cái)