Titlebook: Deontic Logic and Artificial Normative Systems; 8th International Wo Lou Goble,John-Jules Ch. Meyer Conference proceedings 2006 Springer-Ve

小爭吵

厭倦嗎你

植物學(xué)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-40303-7r paper, we attempt to make the idea of a joining between grounds and consequences more precise by using an algebraic representation of normative systems earlier developed by the authors. In the first main part, the idea of intermediate concepts is presented and earlier discussions of the subjects a

Pastry

不愛防注射

GRAIN

玩忽職守

Walter Modell (Associate Professor)perspective of the ongoing dialogue between computational and psychological research. We will develop a view of the domain of human emotions as informed in particular by cognitive appraisal theories and situated cognition research that illustrates the role of emotions within the coordination of acti

迎合

Walter Modell (Associate Professor)the logic of institutional constraints, which again reduces to an expression in the underlying base logic. Counts-as conditionals and institutional constraints are defined as a pre-processing step for the regulative norms. Permissions are defined as exceptions to obligations and their interaction is

Fretful

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-40303-7n of goals, where a goal is delegated to an agent without giving it any power. With two case studies we show the importance of the delegation of power. Finally, we show how the new definition can be related with existing ones by using different levels of abstraction.

碎石

0302-9743 ion of systems for the management of bureaucratic processes in public or private administration, or the speci?cation of database integrity constraints or comput978-3-540-35842-8978-3-540-35843-5Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349