Titlebook: Democratization and Democracy in South Korea, 1960–Present; Hyug Baeg Im Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

輕觸

Metaphor and the Organization of Social Lifensolidation process in a relatively short period of time. Since 1987, South Koreans have institutionalized and regularized competitive and fair elections, and the electoral space has expanded from the national to the local level, and broadened to societal areas. The military that had actually ruled

惰性氣體

弄污

neutral-posture

Rhythms of abomaso—intestinal motilityal democracy prevailed with political and civil liberties, regular and competitive elections, the rule of law, transparency, accountability, and responsiveness. However, premodernity had also coexisted with modern liberal democracy, such as Confucian patrimonialism, regionalism, patriarchal father-l

infatuation

逃避責(zé)任

Y. Ruckebusch (Head),P. Thivend (Head)oral and interinstitutional accountability, responsiveness of representatives, human security, effective administration, transparency and control of corruption, active political participation of citizens, and equality. Recently, however, many have spoken of a retreat of democracy in South Korea. The

配置

淺灘

EXPEL

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59922-9essions but no transition; (3) protracted and inconclusive struggle, standoff and no transition; (4) democratic transition through compromise between “reformers” within the regime and moderate opposition.

Cpap155