Titlebook: Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania; Elvin Gjevori Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 democrat

Levelheaded

書目名稱Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania被引頻次




書目名稱Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania年度引用




書目名稱Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania讀者反饋




書目名稱Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania讀者反饋學科排名

愛好

2662-5857 ratisation reforms. The book will appeal to practitioners working on institutionalisation reforms, institutionalist and democratisation researchers interested in post-authoritarian transitions, and area study scholars focusing on Albania and the Western Balkans..978-3-030-10310-1978-3-319-73071-4Series ISSN 2662-5857 Series E-ISSN 2662-5865

Debate

Amplify

geriatrician

An Overview of the Military and Judiciary in Albania,monstrates that the military and judiciary for almost one century, regardless of Albania’s different regimes, institutional setups, domestic conditions, and international constraints, have been continuously politicised. Interestingly, however, the military—despite sharing with the judiciary a simila

Injunction

Injunction

A New Account of Institutionalisation,ir explanatory mechanisms cannot account for institutionalisation in emerging democracies with unconsolidated institutions?and weak civil society. Therefore, this chapter presents a new theory to account for institutionalisation in emerging democracies like Albania. The theory relies on a constructi

Bmd955

引起痛苦

Newspaper Coverage and Parliamentary Debate of Judicial Reform,f judicial reform were highly politicised throughout the 17-year span of analysis. As importantly, both newspaper coverage and parliamentary debate relied on the memory of communism as the main justificatory mechanism to frame judicial reform. Overall, mutual accusations of communist mentality and c

軟膏