Titlebook: Democratic Network Governance in Europe; Martin Marcussen (Associate Professor),Jacob Torfi Book 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Ma

Harding

書目名稱Democratic Network Governance in Europe影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Democratic Network Governance in Europe影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Democratic Network Governance in Europe網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Democratic Network Governance in Europe網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Democratic Network Governance in Europe被引頻次




書目名稱Democratic Network Governance in Europe被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Democratic Network Governance in Europe年度引用




書目名稱Democratic Network Governance in Europe年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Democratic Network Governance in Europe讀者反饋




書目名稱Democratic Network Governance in Europe讀者反饋學科排名

JIBE

Abrupt

ulating and implementing public policy in a complex, differentiated and multilayered world. This book assesses the recent experiences with governance at local, national and transnational levels978-0-230-59628-3

Bumble

構(gòu)成

強行引入

Karoline Horgmo J?ger,Aslak Tveitogulatory actors, of networks and other constellations setting off an explosion of rules. Many of these rules are of a ‘soft’, legally non-binding and voluntary kind (M?rth 2004). This proliferating regulation is largely a transnational phenomenon, arising between and across countries.

強行引入

Single Species Population Modelscusses the results of empirical studies of networks of public, semi-public and private actors who interact on the basis of mutual dependencies, institutional incentives and shared conceptions that help to facilitate negotiation and joint decision making in the face of persistent conflicts of interes

left-ventricle

C. Castillo-Chavez,S. Busenberg and contextually grounded empirical analysis, in which pertinent features of the context are carried through into theory building. At present the literature on network governance tends to use insights from empirical research as though they had universal applicability. The tendency to decontextualis

鴕鳥

Willi J?ger,Hal Smith,Betty Tangvernance’. This 10 year, 122 million project was to be co-ordinated by a consortium involving three levels of government — national, municipal and the urban districts. Moreover, it encompassed several branches of the public services, including the school system, the social services and the agency fo

自戀

C. Castillo-Chavez,S. Busenbergusive of multiple stakeholders . more negotiated than its hierarchical or market alternatives (Kickert .. 1997; Kooiman 2003; Koppenjan & Klijn 2004; Pierre 2000; Rhodes 1997a, 2000b; Stoker 1998). Thus far, however, the burgeoning literature on the techniques of network management has paid little a