Titlebook: Democratic Foreign Policy Making; Problems of Divided Robert Pahre Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2006 de

風俗習慣

書目名稱Democratic Foreign Policy Making影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Democratic Foreign Policy Making影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Democratic Foreign Policy Making網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Democratic Foreign Policy Making網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Democratic Foreign Policy Making被引頻次




書目名稱Democratic Foreign Policy Making被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Democratic Foreign Policy Making年度引用




書目名稱Democratic Foreign Policy Making年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Democratic Foreign Policy Making讀者反饋




書目名稱Democratic Foreign Policy Making讀者反饋學科排名

fibroblast

Divided Government and International Cooperation in the Nineteenth Century,ive-legislative disagreement makes international cooperation more difficult (Friman 1993; Hammond and Prins 1999; Iida 1993; but Karol 2000; Milner 1997; Milner and Rosendorff 1997; Mo 1995; O’Halloran 1994; but Pahre 2001a). With complete information, the executives negotiate an agreement if the le

畸形

不能強迫我

無畏

Conclusion: Democracy and Foreign Policy,de safe for democracy.” He sought not only safety for democracy in the United States, but the spread of democracy and self-determination throughout the world. Wilson presumed that many good things, from peace to wealth, would flow from success in this endeavor, cemented by a community of democracies

modifier

http://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/265211.jpg

modifier

Book 2006Leading scholars from the United States and the European Union examine how democracies make foreign policy when their citizens disagree. The authors focus in particular on differences of opinion between the legislature and the executive - often called ‘divided government‘ - and the constraints of public opinion on a leader‘s actions.

observatory

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601444democracy; Europe; European Union; European Union (EU); executive; foreign policy; government; Institution;

細微的差異

978-1-349-53526-2Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2006

分貝

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6663-6“Democracy” plays a central role in foreign policy today. Both abroad and at home, this is true in two senses. First, democracy is often the subject of U.S. foreign policy, as it is in many nations. President George W. Bush, like President William Clinton before him, has made the spread of democracy abroad an explicit goal of U.S. foreign policy.