找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Democracy, Populism, and Truth; Mark Christopher Navin,Richard Nunan Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Democracy and Populism.

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: CLOG
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 23:55:40 | 只看該作者
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:04:08 | 只看該作者
Reflections on the Root Causes of Outrage Discourse on Social Mediasify, often resulting in what can best be described as ‘outrage discourse’. This short essay offers some broad reflections on the root causes of outrage discourse on social media. It argues that we can partly understand the phenomenon by paying attention to the particular ways in which political dis
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 07:21:31 | 只看該作者
Identifying Political Participants on Social Media: Conflicts of Epistemic Justicey may both amplify and suppress and the influence they wield. Contributions may be difficult to evaluate, especially if the identity of contributors is masked or unknown. Three approaches to these problems have predominated: regulating content, as in Germany; relying on the marketplace of open ideas
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 12:31:00 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 15:53:58 | 只看該作者
Voting Without Voice: How Votes Can Be Counted Without Counting [, Democracy and the Wasted Vote Protened by the fact that legislature seats are typically won by candidates whose political priorities diverge strikingly from those of many members of the voting public. This divergence is evident at two levels. (1) In local electoral contests, a legislature seat is won by the candidate who secures a
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:37:17 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 00:29:56 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 02:39:36 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:01:49 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-6749-8 disadvantages associated with more traditional media. It then sets out the epistemological difficulties of both content-regulation and the marketplace of ideas. It concludes with a defense of source transparency, tempered by the need to protect the identities of those who may be endangered by disclosure.
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 11:58:09 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-6749-8. The parallels raise comparable questions for potential application on the national stage. As Maine’s case illustrates, political, statutory, and constitutional hurdles to effective electoral reform movements can be quite serious, but perhaps not insurmountable.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 19:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
大丰市| 许昌县| 阿拉善盟| 新郑市| 侯马市| 瑞金市| 台东市| 北海市| 二连浩特市| 平舆县| 得荣县| 福建省| 镇沅| 永康市| 蓝田县| 湖北省| 五大连池市| 石狮市| 乐昌市| 哈尔滨市| 五家渠市| 澳门| 陇川县| 滨州市| 旌德县| 周至县| 新竹县| 甘孜县| 桃源县| 斗六市| 邵东县| 马公市| 阜平县| 英德市| 泗水县| 湖州市| 盘锦市| 海伦市| 万宁市| 徐闻县| 苗栗市|