Titlebook: Democracy in Practice; Ceremony and Ritual Shirin M. Rai (Professor of Politics and Internati Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of

CHARY

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Democracy in Practice影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Democracy in Practice影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Democracy in Practice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Democracy in Practice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Democracy in Practice被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Democracy in Practice被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Democracy in Practice年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Democracy in Practice年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Democracy in Practice讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Democracy in Practice讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

不理會(huì)

978-1-349-47244-4Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014

receptors

Affluence

Die medizinische Grundaufkl?rungthe processes through which particular forms take shape and have affect — through modes of behaviour, negotiating political and physical spaces and creating institution specific cultures which socialise Members in their participation and through examining the performance of ceremony and ritual in in

CARE

棲息地

棲息地

Markus F. Peschl,Thomas Fundneiderure which examines these dynamics and patterns has come to be known collectively as research on the ‘féminisation of polities’. This term is used to describe and assess the extent to which women have both . and . historically male-dominated political institutions (Lovenduski, 2005; Wangnerud, 2009).

偉大

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-38277-6ween parliament and the public sphere. Private members’ motions are the most significant mechanism used by members for raising and responding to wider social issues within parliament’s most publicised deliberative chamber — the plenary. I argue that Motions initiated and introduced by private member

Demulcent

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-02880-8work on them by political scientists. Patrick Dunleavy et al. (1995) and John and Bevan (2011) concentrated on the accountability function and policy content of the questions. Mark Franklin and Philip Norton’s (1993) Parliamentary Questions, published shortly after parliament was televised, included

原諒