Titlebook: Democracy and Military Force; Philip P. Everts Book 2002 Philip P. Everts 2002 Cold War.democracy.Europe.Gulf War

theta-waves

,‘War without Bloodshed’: the Conflict over Kosovo,here should be public support for such military operations, which is what concerns us here. More than in any earlier recent conflict, the question of the degree of public support for the various options and strategies available has taken a central place in the public debate and the calculations of d

參考書(shū)目

alleviate

irritation

Erfolgsfaktoren in Reengineering-Projektenons on the use of the armed forces. It stated: ‘Sufficient public and societal support is an essential condition for both individual operations and commitments over a longer period of time’.. If this is the case when national interests are involved in the traditional sense of threats to the territor

Halfhearted

assail

Democracy and War,command of troops had been an aristocratic pastime and soldiering had been a mercenary occupation. The French revolutionary armies transformed war from a battle between dynasties into a confrontation between peoples. Conscription was introduced in the Napoleonic wars, and remained afterwards. In the

不能平靜

Two Opposing Views,ng history of, often intense, normative, theoretical and empirical debates. In the Age of Enlightenment, thinkers like Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau started to discuss democracy and its implications for policy-making. The debate has never stopped since then, and continues until today, albeit with varyi

裂口

我們的面粉

,Support for War: the Gulf War, 1990–91,he forced incorporation of Kuwait as just another Iraqi province. The United Nations strongly and unanimously condemned this occupation and Iraq was ordered to withdraw its troops. The United States sent troops to neighbouring Saudi Arabia to deter further Iraqi advances. Gradually, other states als

捕鯨魚(yú)叉