Titlebook: Democracy and Military Force; Philip P. Everts Book 2002 Philip P. Everts 2002 Cold War.democracy.Europe.Gulf War

protocol

書目名稱Democracy and Military Force影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Democracy and Military Force影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Democracy and Military Force網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Democracy and Military Force網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Democracy and Military Force被引頻次




書目名稱Democracy and Military Force被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Democracy and Military Force年度引用




書目名稱Democracy and Military Force年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Democracy and Military Force讀者反饋




書目名稱Democracy and Military Force讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

平淡而無味

Führbar oder nicht? (Schritt II)ng history of, often intense, normative, theoretical and empirical debates. In the Age of Enlightenment, thinkers like Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau started to discuss democracy and its implications for policy-making. The debate has never stopped since then, and continues until today, albeit with varyi

討好美人

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08192-0he vast research on the concept of public opinion as one of the most enduring concepts in the social sciences, its definition remains controversial. ‘Public opinions’, like beauty, is essentially in the eyes of the beholder. Indeed, the difficulty of defining public opinion as an object of empirical

conscience

Narrative

Erfolgsfaktoren in Reengineering-Projekten either not interested or not involved, and hence governments enjoy, at least initially, considerable freedom of action, based on a . (as mentioned in Chapter 3). Although governments may still enjoy considerable freedom of action in foreign affairs in general and in emergency situations in particul

BROOK

BROOK

Eructation

Zielsteuerung (Target Controlling)tal changes in the international system for public opinion on the need and the functions of the armed forces and the use of military force. The second question concerned the evidence for the ‘casualties hypothesis’ and the third concerned the interaction between public opinion and political decision

ALB

Führbar oder nicht? (Schritt II)ng history of, often intense, normative, theoretical and empirical debates. In the Age of Enlightenment, thinkers like Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau started to discuss democracy and its implications for policy-making. The debate has never stopped since then, and continues until today, albeit with varying degrees of intensity.

煩憂