Titlebook: Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson; Rhizomatic Connectio Keith Robinson Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2

小平面

,‘O bitches of impossibility!’ Programmatic Dysfunction in the Chaosmos of Deleuze and Whitehead,in sense they are, in that ‘functioning’ seems to be a very dubious thing; in the sense that the way we organize our thought is politically revealing (AO XIII); in the sense that to subject ourselves to any system in order to gain security or control is a way of suppressing life (N 143).. In this se

ALIAS

PLUMP

Die Hochspannungs-Gleichstrommaschineboth ends of the twentieth century. At the start of the century Bergson’s thought was hailed as ‘the beginning of a new era’ and yet, under the weight of criticisms which labelled his thought ‘intuitionist’ or ‘irrationalist’, he virtually disappeared for most of the middle decades of the twentieth

新陳代謝

macabre

Zur Soziologie des Hofmeisterstandestivity that is not limited to the ‘human’. Both writers provide compelling reasons as to why and how contemporary analyses should avoid positing the human person as either an object or a subject. Rather, ‘human’ individuality is to be envisaged as an aspect within the wider, processual effectivity w

向宇宙

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91577-2the ‘event’. It is a concept we are all familiar with in a sense, even in philosophy, since it is so central to much of contemporary thought. It plays, for instance, a central role in Whitehead’s process philosophy, but it is also a key concept for postmodern philosophers like Jacques Derrida and Je

上釉彩

Die Holl?ndische Landwirtschaft William James, and John Dewey.’. There are many readers, particularly in France, who have seen this as attesting to a continuity between the two philosophers.. This impression seems all the more justified given the similar homage Whitehead had earlier paid Bergson in .: ‘I believe that in this doct

nuclear-tests

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91577-2e problems and the power of the concept in resolving them explain its pivotal role in Deleuze’s work. Indeed, it is questionable whether Deleuze’s metaphysics can stand without reciprocal determination. Given the strong connection between Deleuze’s and Whitehead’s philosophies and their common backg

不可救藥

Die Holl?ndische Landwirtschaft for Deleuze, was the sole form of necessity; the empiricist search for the conditions of the new involved a counter-effectuation of the accidents of experience; and events defied the strict modal distinction between possible, impossible and necessary. That the link between empiricism and metaphysic

形狀

Die Holl?ndische Landwirtschaft has been at least one of the primary questions of ‘modern’ philosophy and arguably . question of philosophy in the twentieth century on both sides of the professional divide, informing the questions of language, temporality and other topics. It has also been suggested that the claim regarding the ‘