Titlebook: Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Dystopia; Rahime ?okay Nebio?lu Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusi

瘙癢

craving

Minoritarian Politics of Contemporary Dystopia,or literature in contemporary dystopia and discussing the role of dystopian writers as symptomatologists who not only point at the dystopian sicknesses of today’s societies under late capitalist control but also offer positive cures for these sicknesses.

jungle

LATE

Book 2020examples of dystopia which depict representations of a possible future that is remarkably worse than present society, contemporary dystopia often tends to portray an almost allegorical re-presentation of present society.? Tracing dystopia’s shift from transcendence towards immanence with the rise of

痛得哭了

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-94521-2uthor argues that contemporary dystopia has its origins in the present reality of the global?societies of control under?late capitalism and develops new narrative tendencies not only to reflect but also to resist this reality. Understanding these new dynamics arising in contemporary dystopia is poss

OPINE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-94521-2t underlines two significant moments in the history of dystopia: transcendent moment and immanent moment. As the author argues, the transcendent moment corresponds to the twentieth-century dystopia in which the concept of dystopia is not purged of the dangers of transcendence observed in the concept

向下五度才偏

MOTTO

構(gòu)想

Parabola

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-26788-2he conception of immanent dystopia the author proposes. The analyses mostly revolve around the idea of hybridity, a notion which not only defines the narrative structure of the novel but also characterises the dystopian world depicted in it. The author engages with hybridity as a plane which illustr