Titlebook: Deleuze and the Non/Human; Jon Roffe,Hannah Stark Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2015 Gilles Del

辯論

Kinder, Kindheiten und Kindheitsforschunguze at the hands of those who amass beneath the plural banner of contemporary philosophy for proof of this. Of course the great, unavoidable irony is that the position of father is often only occupied post mortem, symbolic murder being at the same time the installation of this or that thinker at the

Defraud

某人

Flinch

Crayon

可觸知

主動脈

prosthesis

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-94521-2ling the question that I have varied for the title of this essay. In 1991, in a profoundly deconstructive manner, Eduardo Cadava, Peter Connor and Jean-Luc Nancy posed the question, ‘who comes after the subject?’ Implicit in the phrasing is that the very possibility of the question entails a subject

毛細(xì)血管

使糾纏

Physikalische Eigenschaften der Kunstfaser, issues or the treatment of nonhuman animals. There are no demands for the recognition, recovery, or recuperation of Nature, and the book continues to extend the formulas outlined in .: ‘Nature=Industry, Nature=History’ (Deleuze and Guattari 2004 [1972]: 26).