Titlebook: Defining the Limits of Outer Space for Regulatory Purposes; Olavo de Oliviera Bittencourt‘Neto Book 2015 Springer International Publishing

方面

書目名稱Defining the Limits of Outer Space for Regulatory Purposes影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Defining the Limits of Outer Space for Regulatory Purposes影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Defining the Limits of Outer Space for Regulatory Purposes網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Defining the Limits of Outer Space for Regulatory Purposes網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Defining the Limits of Outer Space for Regulatory Purposes被引頻次




書目名稱Defining the Limits of Outer Space for Regulatory Purposes被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Defining the Limits of Outer Space for Regulatory Purposes年度引用




書目名稱Defining the Limits of Outer Space for Regulatory Purposes年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Defining the Limits of Outer Space for Regulatory Purposes讀者反饋




書目名稱Defining the Limits of Outer Space for Regulatory Purposes讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Aphorism

Air Space and Outer Space, of sovereignty, Space Law overtly forbids any form of national appropriation. Widely accepted treaties provided those rules, which can even be recognized as of a fundamental character to Air Law and Space Law. Therefore, the different standards contributed to the creation of two immiscible legal sy

任命

cutlery

Proposals, for a better understanding of their main features. Each alternative can be considered as pertaining to the spatialist approach, since they are all based on the premise that the delimitation of the air space/outer space boundary is necessary. The international law scholars that backed them, as well

Arrhythmia

National Legislation and Comparative Law, one another. Thus, it is import to resort to Comparative Law to achieve a comprehensive verification of those few alternatives presented by States for solution of the problem, in order to identify not only legal patterns but also to understand the reasons behind those laws. As taught by Rudolf Schl

Albumin

Albumin

R. G. Mirimanov,N. E. Sirotina,V. I. Neymand built to imprison the Minotaur, Daedalus imagined an original way to escape from his own prison. Along with his son Icarus, he built artificial wings with feathers, attached to leather strains tied around their bodies. Using these devices, legend says that Daedalus and Icarus were able to reach th

親密

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6414-6 of sovereignty, Space Law overtly forbids any form of national appropriation. Widely accepted treaties provided those rules, which can even be recognized as of a fundamental character to Air Law and Space Law. Therefore, the different standards contributed to the creation of two immiscible legal sy

頂點(diǎn)

R. G. Mirimanov,N. E. Sirotina,V. I. Neymanncluded in rapid succession: the “Space Treaty” of 1967; the “Rescue Agreement” of 1968; the “Liability Convention” of 1972; the “Registration Convention” of 1975; and the “Moon Agreement” of 1979. Those treaties were, in general, well received by the international community, and provided legal rule

高爾夫

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6414-6 for a better understanding of their main features. Each alternative can be considered as pertaining to the spatialist approach, since they are all based on the premise that the delimitation of the air space/outer space boundary is necessary. The international law scholars that backed them, as well