Titlebook: Deconstructing Olduvai: A Taphonomic Study of the Bed I Sites; Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo,Rebeca Barba Egido,Charle Book 2007 Springer Scien

小卒

Zooarchaeology and taphonomy of FLK North 5, Chapter 12), no systematic taphonomic data have been presented for the large mammal subassemblage since Leakey’s (1971) monograph (see Fernández-Jalvo .., 1998 for a discussion of small mammals). Therefore, and despite the fact that both cut marks and tooth marks have been identified in the large m

insipid

Natural background bone assemblages and their ravaging stages in Olduvai Bed I,quivalent in natural processes of bone dispersal and concentration in modern savannas (see Chapter 1). The ongoing landscape archaeology project at Olduvai has obtained a wealth of information about bone scatters on the landscape during that time. Cushing’s (2002) study of these scatters reveals tha

有花

能夠支付

Zooarchaeology and taphonomy of FLK North North 2,skeletons. She classified FLK NN2 as a deposit with vertically dispersed material, unlike the classic Bed I “l(fā)iving floors” such as DK Level 3, FLK Level 22, and FLK North North Level 3 where artifacts and faunal material were concentrated in discrete horizons.

憤慨一下

Reanalysis of FLK North North 3: yet another case of a palimpsest?,therefore slightly older than the FLK . level. It is the oldest site in Olduvai after the DK complex, discussed in Chapter 15 (Leakey, 1971). It is also one of the three archaeological levels in Bed I – the other two being DK-3 and FLK . – that are limited to a thin horizon over a paleosol. FLK NN3

失誤

藥物

cuticle

都相信我的話

Der Traum des Seglers bei Flauteitionally been interpreted as favored locations to which hominids repeatedly transported carcass parts for processing (Leakey, 1971; Isaac, 1978, 1983, 1984; Bunn, 1982, 1991; Potts, 1982, 1988; Bunn and Kroll, 1986; Schick, 1987; Blumenschine, 1988, 1991, 1995; Bunn and Ezzo, 1993; Schick and Toth,

Introduction