Titlebook: Decoding Political Discourse; Conceptual Metaphors Maria-Ionela Neagu Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limi

HARDY

書目名稱Decoding Political Discourse影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Decoding Political Discourse影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Decoding Political Discourse網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Decoding Political Discourse網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Decoding Political Discourse被引頻次




書目名稱Decoding Political Discourse被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Decoding Political Discourse年度引用




書目名稱Decoding Political Discourse年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Decoding Political Discourse讀者反饋




書目名稱Decoding Political Discourse讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

真實(shí)的人

Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Political Discourse Analysis,e analytical framework of the research. It is advocated a combination of critical discourse analysis, argumentation theory, and cognitive semantics (conceptual metaphor theory) to account for the production and reconstruction of meaning in political discourse. Insights into transpersonal psychology

GLEAN

Decoding Conceptual Metaphors,residential debates in 2008 while approaching topics such as: the financial crisis, energy independence, the health care system, education, and military conflicts. It is claimed that the contrastive analysis of the arguers’ metaphorical reasoning will outline the boundaries of the ‘disagreement spac

Tortuous

Symbolic Power and Argumentation,orrelates with social action and practice. The empirical investigation takes a different turn in this chapter. It is argued that agents perceive the world according to their habitus, their instilled dispositions, and internalized values which impact upon their use of language. The range of argumenta

Palate

凈禮

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85073-7l argument. The chapter also provides relevant information regarding the methodology of research, in particular the metaphor identification procedure, corpus-related issues, and the pragma-dialectical reconstruction procedure of the argumentative discourse.

凈禮

假設(shè)

Heinrich und Amalie von Beguelinresidential debates in 2008 while approaching topics such as: the financial crisis, energy independence, the health care system, education, and military conflicts. It is claimed that the contrastive analysis of the arguers’ metaphorical reasoning will outline the boundaries of the ‘disagreement spac

潰爛

The Centrality of the Rate of Interestorrelates with social action and practice. The empirical investigation takes a different turn in this chapter. It is argued that agents perceive the world according to their habitus, their instilled dispositions, and internalized values which impact upon their use of language. The range of argumenta

visual-cortex