| 書目名稱 | Decision Science and Social Risk Management | | 副標題 | A Comparative Evalua | | 編輯 | Miley W. Merkhofer | | 視頻video | http://file.papertrans.cn/265/264265/264265.mp4 | | 叢書名稱 | Risk, Governance and Society | | 圖書封面 |  | | 描述 | Economists, decision analysts, management scientists, and others have long argued that government should take a more scientific approach to decision making. Pointing to various theories for prescribing and rational- izing choices, they have maintained that social goals could be achieved more effectively and at lower costs if government decisions were routinely subjected to analysis. Now, government policy makers are putting decision science to the test. Recent government actions encourage and in some cases require government decisions to be evaluated using formally defined principles 01‘ rationality. Will decision science pass tbis test? The answer depends on whether analysts can quickly and successfully translate their theories into practical approaches and whether these approaches promote the solution of the complex, highly uncertain, and politically sensitive problems that are of greatest concern to government decision makers. The future of decision science, perhaps even the nation‘s well-being, depends on the outcome. A major difficulty for the analysts who are being called upon by government to apply decision-aiding approaches is that decision science has not yet evolved a uni | | 出版日期 | Book 1987 | | 關(guān)鍵詞 | Distribution; Risk Management; bargaining; calculus; decision analysis; decision making; decision theory; e | | 版次 | 1 | | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4698-9 | | isbn_softcover | 978-94-010-8589-2 | | isbn_ebook | 978-94-009-4698-9Series ISSN 2512-3076 Series E-ISSN 2512-3084 | | issn_series | 2512-3076 | | copyright | D. Reidel Publishing Company 1987 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|
派博傳思國際
( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328)
GMT+8, 2025-10-15 17:35
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:50:18
