Titlebook: Decision Making in Criminal Justice; Toward the Rational Michael R. Gottfredson,Don M. Gottfredson Book 1988 Springer Science+Business Med

彩色的蠟筆

Lineage

滋養(yǎng)

The Decision to Charge,initiate prosecution and, if so, for what crime or crimes. In most American jurisdictions this decision rests with the district attorney.. In this chapter we will review selected empirical studies bearing on this important decision; investigate the goals, information, and alternatives pertaining to

AGGER

中止

Correctional Decisions in the Community,r is to be placed on probation (usually with suspension of a more severe sanction), whether he or she is to be sent to jail (or these sanctions are to be used in combination), whether another alternative is to be selected, or whether the person is to be sent to prison. All these decisions that are n

Fluctuate

BORE

Parole Decisions,rison system, was a featured speaker. Crofton believed that the intent of the law was to make prisons “more than places of safekeeping” and that there should be programs of reform in prison with “tickets of leave” given only to those who evidenced a change in attitude (Newman, 1963:29). Tickets of l

fatty-streak

猛然一拉

The Decision to Charge,pter we will review selected empirical studies bearing on this important decision; investigate the goals, information, and alternatives pertaining to the decision; and assess how what is learned bears on the requirements of rationality.

infatuation

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0409-4ide the context for our later detailed investigations, to define our terms, and to give a glimpse of our conclusions. The justification for these conclusions comes, we believe, in the remainder of the book.