Titlebook: Decentralization and Local Development in South East Europe; Will Bartlett (Senior Research Fellow in the Polit Book 2013 Palgrave Macmill

本義

書目名稱Decentralization and Local Development in South East Europe影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Decentralization and Local Development in South East Europe影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Decentralization and Local Development in South East Europe網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Decentralization and Local Development in South East Europe網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Decentralization and Local Development in South East Europe被引頻次




書目名稱Decentralization and Local Development in South East Europe被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Decentralization and Local Development in South East Europe年度引用




書目名稱Decentralization and Local Development in South East Europe年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Decentralization and Local Development in South East Europe讀者反饋




書目名稱Decentralization and Local Development in South East Europe讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

反饋

Das geistige Umfeld der Informationstechniklson, 2004). For example, Finland’s ?land Islands have experienced a large degree of autonomy since 1920, successfully balancing the demands for minority rights of the ?land Islands’ mostly Swedish population and the interests of the Finnish state.

不能妥協(xié)

刺激

Clumsy

Das Glück der Theorie (Aristoteles) in 2008, it is 65% higher than the World Bank average for this income group and ranks 64th on the World Bank GDP per capita PPP ranking). With regard to its population the whole country could easily be one NUTS2 region (out of 271 NUTS2 regions in the EU27, 13 have a larger population and 79 a larger GDP).

極少

Decentralization and Regionalization in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Context, Model and Implementation Challe Bosnia-Herzegovina case from those contemporaneous, peacetime situations where the primary concern of decentralization tends to be its functional role in the context of building a multi-level system of governance to improve development outcomes (Schou and Hang, 2005).

極少

姑姑在炫耀

Towards Policy Entrepreneurship at Community Level: The Impact of Decentralization on Local Public S argued to improve governance in public service provision in at least three ways: by improving the efficiency of resource allocation, by promoting accountability and reducing corruption within government, and by improving cost recovery (Azfar et al., 1999).

縱火

The Nature of Spatial Inequalities in South East Europe and the Scope for Decentralized Regional Polthese countries under perceived or direct pressures for democratization and Europeanization. In turn, these developments too have a potentially important bearing on local capacities to stimulate economic development and, by implication, on regional disparities in incomes and rates of growth.

overhaul

A NUTS2 View of Regional Inequality in Croatia, 1968–2008 in 2008, it is 65% higher than the World Bank average for this income group and ranks 64th on the World Bank GDP per capita PPP ranking). With regard to its population the whole country could easily be one NUTS2 region (out of 271 NUTS2 regions in the EU27, 13 have a larger population and 79 a larger GDP).