Titlebook: Debt Relief for Poor Countries; Tony Addison (Deputy Director),Henrik Hansen (Asso Book 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan P

monologue

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90531-0he Brady plan. However, in the second half of the 1990s, policy-makers around the world began to recognize that very high large debt levels were a contributing factor to the extreme poverty of many low-income countries, despite the fact that a sizeable share of the lending to these countries had occurred at concessional rates.

技術(shù)

苦惱

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90856-4 to the poorest and most indebted countries. The World Bank and the IMF launched the first version (HIPC I) in 1996. In 1999 it was enhanced following global consultations in Cologne, where it was considered necessary to provide more extensive and faster debt relief with clearer links to poverty reduction (HIPC II).

有偏見(jiàn)

Debt Relief, Demand for Education and Poverty along with high estimated returns to schooling in many HIPCs, are often cited as justification for increased public investment in education (Table 11.1). As a result, explicit targets for expanding school enrolment rates and other performance criteria for education expenditures have been set in HIPC programmes.

沒(méi)有貧窮

Terrorismus und Kriegsgeschehen,al forum of the Paris Club negotiations since the 1970s, was approaching deadlock. The need for radical measures for writing off bilateral and multilateral official debt finally surfaced as an open agenda on the negotiating table in 1996.

深陷

Amylase

秘傳

Debt Dynamics and Contingency Financing: Theoretical Reappraisal of the HIPC Initiativeal forum of the Paris Club negotiations since the 1970s, was approaching deadlock. The need for radical measures for writing off bilateral and multilateral official debt finally surfaced as an open agenda on the negotiating table in 1996.

沒(méi)花的是打擾

contradict

HIPC Debt Relief and Policy Reform Incentives to implement the appropriate policies needed to promote economic growth. As a consequence, high debt implied low growth and, in the absence of a major debt relief initiative, heavily indebted countries were meant to stay trapped in a low equilibrium.