Titlebook: Debating the Canon; A Reader from Addiso Lee Morrissey Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2005 creativity.dram

定點

induct

,Mortimer J. Adler (1902–2001) “Reading and the Growth of the Mind,” , (1940),We have defined active reading as the asking of questions, and we have indicated what questions must be asked of any book, and how those questions must be answered in different ways for different kinds of books.

forebear

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04916-2creativity; drama; fragment; higher education; history of literature; Imagination; Interpretation; Jacques

compassion

增強

Book 2005ucation. Debating the Canon provides a primary-source overview of these ongoing arguments. Many of these contributions to this debate have achieved ‘canonical‘ status themselves; through the focus on the canon, the full spectrum of approaches to literary studies can be seen in the essays. Therefore,

眉毛

,Samuel Johnson (1709–1784) from “Preface to the Plays of William Shakespeare” (1765),through artificial opacity. The great contention of criticism is to find the faults of the moderns, and the beauties of the ancients. While an author is yet living we estimate his powers by his worst performance, and when he is dead, we rate them by his best.

paradigm

整體

,Chinua Achebe (1930–) “Colonialist Criticism,” , (1974, 1988), the temptation to blame other people. Secondly, it may be said that whatever colonialism may have done in the past, the very fact of a Commonwealth Conference today is sufficient repudiation of it, is indeed a symbol of a new relationship of equality between peoples who were once masters and servants.

允許

,Annette Kolodny (1941–) from “A Map for Rereading: Or, Gender and the Interpretation of Literary Te argued in . in 1975, “a poem is a response to a poem, as a poet is a response to a poet, or a person to his parent.” Thus, for Bloom, “poems ... are neither about ‘subjects’ nor about ‘themselves’. They are necessrily about ..”

推崇