Titlebook: Debating the Canon; A Reader from Addiso Lee Morrissey Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2005 creativity.dram

小客車

書目名稱Debating the Canon影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Debating the Canon影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating the Canon網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Debating the Canon網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating the Canon被引頻次




書目名稱Debating the Canon被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating the Canon年度引用




書目名稱Debating the Canon年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating the Canon讀者反饋




書目名稱Debating the Canon讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

nettle

控制

BARK

,F.R. Leavis (1895–1978) from , (1933),rks of this kind is the age that has given currency to the term “high-brow.” But it would be as true to say that the attitude implicit in “high-brow” causes this use of talent as the converse. The minority is being cut off as never before from the powers that rule the world; and as Mr. George A. Bir

tympanometry

,Erich Auerbach (1892–1957) from “Odysseus’ Scar,” , (1946; trans. 1953),ep Penelope in ignorance. No sooner has the old woman touched the scar than, in her joyous surprise, she lets Odysseus’ foot drop into the basin; the water spills over, she is about to cry out her joy; Odysseus restrains her with whispered threats and endearments; she recovers herself and conceals h

GLOSS

GLOSS

OTTER

,Elaine Showalter (1941–) from “The Female Tradition,” , (1977),t seemed that the nineteenth century was the Age of the Female Novelist. With such stellar examples as Jane Austen, Charlotte Bront?, and George Eliot, the question of women’s aptitude for fiction, at any rate, had been answered. But a larger question was whether women, excluded by custom and educat

clarify

,William J. Bennett (1943–) from “To Reclaim a Legacy,” , (1985),e on many of our campuses is an unclaimed legacy, a course of studies in which the humanities have been siphoned off, diluted, or so adulterated that students graduate knowing little of their heritage.

exhibit

,Elizabeth Meese (1943–) from “Sexual Politics and Critical Judgment,” in Gregory S. Jay and David Lglish; or conversely, what we teach in departments of English is literature. Within that closed definitional circle, we perform the rituals by which we cast out unworthy pretenders from our ranks and induct true initiates, guardians of the standards by which all song and story ought presumably to be