找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Debating Europe in National Parliaments; Public Justification Frank Wendler Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: CRUST
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:01:35 | 只看該作者
Introduction,ve brought European issues into the spotlight of public debate (cp. Cramme and Hobolt 2015; Risse 2014). From a political science perspective, studying the public debate about the EU in parliaments is attractive for several reasons. The stances of political actors and parties can be studied firsthan
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:01:53 | 只看該作者
Theoretical Framework,chapter is to show how the model can be adapted to the analysis of public debate on issues of European integration in national parliaments and to present the resulting hypotheses that will guide the empirical analysis.
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:33:31 | 只看該作者
Formats of Parliamentary Debate About the European Union,cted as case studies (to be presented in the next chapter). Its aim is to show that considerable differences can be observed particularly between the relatively closed, top-down communication in the French National Assembly, and the more open, relatively balanced, and polarized exchange between parl
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:07:54 | 只看該作者
The Polarization of Parliamentary Parties,an be gained from a differentiation of the three distinct normative frames based on identity, political values, and legitimacy. Second, this chapter traces these links between justification and polarization in a comparative analysis of the five thematic case studies within each of these four levels
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 22:07:34 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:26:51 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,tive to expect a variety of very diverse arguments, debates, and degrees of contention in the public debate on European governance. Against this background, the main argument of the book is to show how evaluative statements about European integration can be systematically linked to observable patter
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 07:47:57 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09534-7ve brought European issues into the spotlight of public debate (cp. Cramme and Hobolt 2015; Risse 2014). From a political science perspective, studying the public debate about the EU in parliaments is attractive for several reasons. The stances of political actors and parties can be studied firsthan
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 08:27:48 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09534-7chapter is to show how the model can be adapted to the analysis of public debate on issues of European integration in national parliaments and to present the resulting hypotheses that will guide the empirical analysis.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:56:21 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:52:20 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-23 07:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
红安县| 永济市| 宝山区| 高唐县| 邢台市| 阿巴嘎旗| 日土县| 溆浦县| 奉贤区| 叶城县| 凭祥市| 双鸭山市| 白沙| 清流县| 台中市| 吉安县| 沧源| 福建省| 内江市| 奉贤区| 麻城市| 扎囊县| 大洼县| 宣恩县| 濮阳县| 若尔盖县| 乐至县| 广平县| 阿拉善左旗| 海伦市| 堆龙德庆县| 兰坪| 瓮安县| 济阳县| 威信县| 湟源县| 崇礼县| 乌拉特后旗| 龙陵县| 德昌县| 澜沧|