Titlebook: Debating Collaboration and Complicity in War Crimes Trials in Asia, 1945-1956; Kerstin von Lingen Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

Wilson

書目名稱Debating Collaboration and Complicity in War Crimes Trials in Asia, 1945-1956影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Debating Collaboration and Complicity in War Crimes Trials in Asia, 1945-1956影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating Collaboration and Complicity in War Crimes Trials in Asia, 1945-1956網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Debating Collaboration and Complicity in War Crimes Trials in Asia, 1945-1956網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating Collaboration and Complicity in War Crimes Trials in Asia, 1945-1956被引頻次




書目名稱Debating Collaboration and Complicity in War Crimes Trials in Asia, 1945-1956被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating Collaboration and Complicity in War Crimes Trials in Asia, 1945-1956年度引用




書目名稱Debating Collaboration and Complicity in War Crimes Trials in Asia, 1945-1956年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating Collaboration and Complicity in War Crimes Trials in Asia, 1945-1956讀者反饋




書目名稱Debating Collaboration and Complicity in War Crimes Trials in Asia, 1945-1956讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

minaret

Koreans in the Trials of Japanese War Crimes Suspects,ruited to work as civilian guards in prisoner-of-war and internment camps outside the Japanese home islands. The Allied war crimes trials of 1945–1951 specifically targeted camp personnel, and the great majority of the Koreans convicted as ‘Japanese’ war criminals were former guards. The standard sc

倔強(qiáng)不能

,Defining Colonial “War Crimes”: Korean Debates on Collaboration, War Reparations, and the Internatireans were not given any significant role in the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE), Korean political leaders and intellectuals in both Korea and Japan created their own movements and debates on how to define Japanese and Korean “war crimes” committed within a colonial context.

Demulcent

Ergots

,Puppets, Profiteers and Traitors: Defining Wartime Collaboration in the Dutch East Indies, 1945–194n by the urge to do justice. If the punishment of war crimes served political ends, it is likely that the punishment of wartime collaboration, especially in a colonial context, was even more politicized. This hypothesis is tested by looking at the ideas of the Dutch East Indies government on the pro

宣傳

Between Postoccupation and Postcolonial: Framing the Recent Past in the Philippine Treason Amnesty egislators of an independent Philippine republic in 1948 over whether to approve a partial presidential amnesty for wartime collaborators. The eventual approval of the amnesty brought an end to a struggling People’s Court system of trying treason cases, abandoned prosecutions for all accused politic

宣傳

Japanese Medical Atrocities and the Collaboration of the Scientific Elites: Postwar Perspectives,ted by the Japanese Imperial Army stopped after the empire collapsed in 1945, but none of the physicians, scientists, or army personnel who took part in these deeds were indicted or tried by the Americans. The most prominent of these men were given immunity in exchange for the data derived from thei

Hla461

notification

crockery

Cold and Austere Beauty in Harbin, Chiname of the objections to the amnesty on the grounds of class discrimination that ultimately failed to persuade the majority but argues that, on all sides, participants saw the Philippine experience as deeply integrated in a broader global process of confronting the legacies of brutal foreign occupations.