Titlebook: Debating Business School Legitimacy; Attacking, Rocking, Anders ?rtenblad,Riina Koris Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Auth

疼死我了

Introduction: Living in Dark Times,nd often-competing demands of both external and internal stakeholders. This chapter sets out the nature of these demands and the impossibility of success as schools strive for legitimacy amid pressure to generate profit-bearing income to cross-subsidize other institutional units such as schools, dep

最小

Introduction: Living in Dark Times,hypocritical legitimacy.”?By professing UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) but not implementing them within their own operations, business schools are looking but not being good. Despite the “symbolic legitimacy” of references to impact in business school mission statements underpinned by the?s

PAGAN

說(shuō)笑

THE

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449573ccess in adapting to the changing economic and social environment. I review four of the most prominent dilemmas: (1) rigor versus relevance in research, (2) purpose versus performance as the?.?of business schools, (3) the emphasis on research versus teaching, and (4) the placement of students versus

Intellectual

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449573ols of business do not deliver this to the extent needed, but they have great potential to assume that role. Business schools are well positioned to build the character of their students through developing individuals who are morally aware, characterized by proper judgment, motivation, and courage i

用不完

Alopecia-Areata

外露

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230275218ttle. However, these critics usually compare realistic accounts of how bad business school is to unrealistic and idealized accounts of liberal arts education. In fact, liberal arts is a waste of time and money for most students, who learn almost nothing from it and forget most of what they know. Lib

MITE