Titlebook: Deaths After Police Contact; Constructing Account David Baker Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Criminology.Po

自由才謹(jǐn)慎

書目名稱Deaths After Police Contact影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Deaths After Police Contact影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deaths After Police Contact網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Deaths After Police Contact網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deaths After Police Contact被引頻次




書目名稱Deaths After Police Contact被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deaths After Police Contact年度引用




書目名稱Deaths After Police Contact年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deaths After Police Contact讀者反饋




書目名稱Deaths After Police Contact讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

意外的成功

無思維能力

值得

Demulcent

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03236-2roduction of findings in these cases is partly driven by the requirements of audiences, and consequently consideration is given to the nature of audiences that ‘consume’ the findings which have been produced. As such, discourse represents a cyclical process of production and consumption, and this relationship is also considered.

遺傳

遺傳

Constructing Verdicts in the Coronial System,t narrative verdicts to examine how juries use specific measurements to assess actions and inactions related to state organisations in these cases. This highlights the fundamental importance of how and why parameters are constructed in the first place in order for juries to be able to use them.

緯線

facetious

不公開

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3488-3esses used to construct accountability. As the book reaches its conclusion it reconsiders the key findings identified from this retrospective research process and uses them as a way to look forward in an attempt to ascertain how accountability construction might continue to evolve in cases of DAPC.