Titlebook: Death Determination by Neurologic Criteria; Areas of Consensus a Ariane Lewis,James L. Bernat Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T

分離

Arguments Supporting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Deathe and needs reasoned accounts of which brain functions characterize the brain-as-a-whole and why. There is noncongruence between the biological concept of death as irreversible and the accepted medical practice of determining death at a time when the vital functions have ceased permanently but not i

crescendo

Arguments Rejecting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Deathn of oxygenated blood (irreversible cessation of brain function being necessary but not sufficient). Irreversible apneic unconsciousness is best understood not as a concept of death but as a stipulative criterion. Concepts of life and death and their corresponding criteria derive from fundamental wo

jaundiced

What Provisions Belong in a Statute on the Determination of Death by?Neurologic Criteria?her questions, this chapter asks about the level of specificity at which policy choices should be expressed: as basic concepts, standards, medical criteria, or procedures and tests? May the establishment of criteria that will guide practitioners be delegated to medical groups? What is the phenomenon

挑剔為人

Preserved Hypothalamic Function Does Not Preclude Determination of Death by?Neurologic Criteriaofessional, and ethical arguments until the mismatch is resolved. Meanwhile, it remains true that no patient who meets the conditions for determination of death by neurologic criteria ever regains consciousness or breathes independently again, irrespective of the presence or absence of neuroendocrin

最有利

overwrought

主動(dòng)脈

Arguments in Favor of Requiring the Absence of Brain Circulation to Determine Death by Neurologic Crrequire the absence of brain circulation: (1) more accurate determination of loss of all functions of the entire brain, (2) more accurate determination of irreversibility, and (3) improved congruity with the determination of death by circulatory-respiratory criteria.

泥土謙卑

Arguments Opposing the Requirement to Demonstrate Absence of Brain Circulation to Determine Death byargue that the determination of death by neurologic criteria does not require the demonstration of absent brain circulation. Our arguments are based on three main points. First, we contend that the evaluation for death by neurologic criteria is focused on the clinical demonstration of permanent loss

礦石

個(gè)人長(zhǎng)篇演說(shuō)

Temperature Considerations in the Determination of Death by?Neurologic Criteriariteria, focusing on hypothermia. We also provide recommendations on managing temperature/hypothermia to facilitate determination of death by neurologic criteria, including the use of ancillary testing where appropriate.