Titlebook: Current Common Dilemmas in Colorectal Surgery; Christopher M. Schlachta,Patricia Sylla Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG 2018

裙帶關(guān)系

石墨

燒烤

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48481-1mmon indications. The surgical management of perforated diverticulitis is still evolving from a three-stage procedure in the mid-twentieth century to either Hartmann’s procedure or primary anastomosis nowadays. The morbidity associated with Hartmann’s reversal has led to increased interest toward pr

HEW

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48481-1 due to the increasing use of laparoscopy to treat perforated colonic diverticular disease..Most of the traditional indications for elective interval colectomy (after one acute episode for patients under 50?years of age, after two or more episodes of uncomplicated bouts of diverticulitis, or patient

補(bǔ)角

Myosin

臆斷

Fulminant , Colitis: Colon-Preserving Therapiescy total abdominal colectomy in a critically ill patient may result in significant morbidity, it is often left as a procedure of last resort. Given the importance of early intervention, minimally invasive colon-preserving therapies (operative and non-operative) have emerged as attractive options.

得意牛

Dictation

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48287-9ere are multiple reasons for failure to adopt these techniques despite the fact that emergency laparoscopy has proven diagnostic and therapeutic advantages. Laparoscopic management of small bowel obstruction is feasible in selected patients.

Aerate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46377-9mechanical bowel preparation. This review examines these seemingly contradictory results particularly in the setting of a changing surgical environment with increasing adoption of minimally invasive techniques and enhanced recovery programs.