Titlebook: Culture in World Politics; Dominique Jacquin-Berdal,Andrew Oros,Marco Verweij Book 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publis

名字

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11205-0g Western states. . Yet one of the paradigm‘s main purposes is to transcend time and space in order to recognize patterns in the recurrence of international conflict. Can any such intellectual endeavour be free of prejudices and cultural biases?

艦旗

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11205-0process are embedded within given cultural settings. This body of implicit, received truth is reflected both in actual behaviour and also in the language used by a society to talk about conflict. Every society has a vocabulary of specialized terms and expressions loaded with affective and metaphoric

溺愛

接合

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11205-0s over concrete economic and strategic interests, and that state-level actors in inter-state conflicts share a common frame of reference. This chapter argues that while there are times when these long-held ideas are adequate to understand conflict, there are also situations where attention to cultur

腐爛

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11205-0and Israeli troops in Gaza and in the Sinai. On the first evening that the United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF) was deployed in Gaza, UNEF troops sprayed with machinegun fire a minaret from which a . was calling the faithful to prayer. The UNEF soldiers, not understanding Arabic or Islam, had mista

grovel

集中營(yíng)

Neorealist Claims in Light of Ancient Chinese Philosophy: the Cultural Dimension of International Tg Western states. . Yet one of the paradigm‘s main purposes is to transcend time and space in order to recognize patterns in the recurrence of international conflict. Can any such intellectual endeavour be free of prejudices and cultural biases?

宮殿般

Culture in World Politics: an Introduction,case for this can be made in at least two ways. First, it can be argued that existing theories of international relations (IR) overlook important explanations and aspects of world events by not focusing on cultural phenomena. A powerful argument along these lines is made by Yale Ferguson in chapter

obstinate

International Political Economy as a Culture of Competition,rnational life. As members of an international society, states are constituted as independent actors who must rely primarily on their own resources and efforts to achieve their goals and purposes. This requirement of ‘self-help’ becomes ‘competitive self-help’ where the goals and purposes of states

大猩猩

Neorealist Claims in Light of Ancient Chinese Philosophy: the Cultural Dimension of International Tg Western states. . Yet one of the paradigm‘s main purposes is to transcend time and space in order to recognize patterns in the recurrence of international conflict. Can any such intellectual endeavour be free of prejudices and cultural biases?