找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid; Between Public and P Alicja Jagielska–Burduk Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 9266|回復(fù): 41
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:40:29 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid
副標題Between Public and P
編輯Alicja Jagielska–Burduk
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/241/240812/240812.mp4
概述Presents the legal concept of cultural heritage in the context of international public and private law.Adopts a broad perspective on cultural heritage while presenting current challenges and emerging
圖書封面Titlebook: Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid; Between Public and P Alicja Jagielska–Burduk Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
描述.This book examines cultural heritage law in both its public and private modalities, focusing on the search for new solutions in national legislations. Both tangible and intangible cultural heritage pose challenges for national legislation regarding the legal histories of the respective countries, obligations deriving from international law, and the independence of respective national searches for a tailored protection model. Although the concept of cultural heritage transcends civil law regulation and property rights, it must be considered when attempting to establish any coherent cultural heritage protection system. In national legislation, we can now observe an increased interest in leveraging civil law or private law to strengthen cultural heritage protection systems. This book looks beyond public and private law on cultural heritage in order to address its complex status as a legal hybrid...?Further, the book shows how current problems in the international debate are mirrored in national legislation. Poland is used as a practical example, while also referring to other countries’ solutions as well as EU and international law instruments. This approach enables the reader to exam
出版日期Book 2022
關(guān)鍵詞Legal hybrid; Cultural heritage; Cultural property; Decodification; Publicization of private law; Dereifi
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04946-0
isbn_softcover978-3-031-04948-4
isbn_ebook978-3-031-04946-0
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid被引頻次




書目名稱Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid年度引用




書目名稱Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid讀者反饋




書目名稱Cultural Heritage as a Legal Hybrid讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:25:40 | 只看該作者
Cultural Heritage: Legal Concepts and Protection,ltural heritage protection. First, the decodification of civil codes, an already ongoing process with a different pace particularly national civil law systems, affects the evolution of cultural heritage law. Second, parallel to decodification, the publicization of civil codes integrates provisions o
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:13:12 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:02:54 | 只看該作者
A New Approach to Cultural Heritage and the Legal Regime of Common Resources in Poland, search for resource management mechanisms can be observed. Some symptoms of this new approach may be noticed in recent case law. This makes it possible to consider the extent to which private law recognises the protection of cultural heritage components and where public regulations are necessary to
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:16:34 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:37:44 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:40:42 | 只看該作者
rored in national legislation. Poland is used as a practical example, while also referring to other countries’ solutions as well as EU and international law instruments. This approach enables the reader to exam978-3-031-04948-4978-3-031-04946-0
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:07:54 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:24:04 | 只看該作者
Introduction: Remembering Watergate,ltural heritage protection. First, the decodification of civil codes, an already ongoing process with a different pace particularly national civil law systems, affects the evolution of cultural heritage law. Second, parallel to decodification, the publicization of civil codes integrates provisions o
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:34:45 | 只看該作者
Michael A. Genovese,Iwan W. Morganons that are now offered for sale as NFTs or only available as online files without a tangible?carrier. The fragmentation of national cultural heritage legislation in Poland is presented via the example of the Act on Fryderyk Chopin’s cultural heritage.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-23 11:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
德钦县| 民县| 大同市| 安平县| 南宫市| 湘乡市| 长泰县| 绥阳县| 隆尧县| 峨眉山市| 永州市| 濮阳县| 伊川县| 苏尼特左旗| 峨山| 花莲县| 荣昌县| 盐城市| 额敏县| 神农架林区| 泰安市| 阿尔山市| 台湾省| 巫溪县| 洞头县| 商洛市| 五河县| 通渭县| 大同市| 德兴市| 宁南县| 北川| 阿尔山市| 东海县| 嘉峪关市| 顺昌县| 独山县| 汉源县| 故城县| 牙克石市| 大宁县|