Titlebook: Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market; Russell Keat Book 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000 br

DIGN

書目名稱Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market被引頻次




書目名稱Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market年度引用




書目名稱Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market讀者反饋




書目名稱Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

expository

Consumer Sovereignty and the Integrity of Practicesmarket principles and commercially modelled forms of organization into a wide range of activities previously conducted upon different principles, and ‘protected’ by means such as public funding or subsidy from the forces operating in a free market economy. These extensions of the market have raised,

refraction

Scepticism, Authority and the Marketted market forces. In particular, it considers the implications for these debates of the relationships between forms of social authority and epistemological theories (i.e., theories about whether, and in what ways, various kinds of knowledge-claims can be justified)..

Ordnance

Citizens, Consumers and the Environment: Reflections on made about environmental issues, such as the protection of wilderness and landscapes, or of various species of plants or animals, the control of air and water pollution, and so on.. This economistic approach does not consist of consigning such matters to the ‘decisions’ made by an unregulated market

真

EXALT

EXALT

Acetaldehyde

Justifying the Market , its Limitationto dispense with this altogether, one must clearly avoid using arguments which would actually imply its total rejection. For example, if one argues that cultural institutions should be protected from the market because of the damaging effects upon them of ‘consumer sovereignty’, one must show why it

infantile

FILLY

David R Blanks,Michael Frassettomarket principles and commercially modelled forms of organization into a wide range of activities previously conducted upon different principles, and ‘protected’ by means such as public funding or subsidy from the forces operating in a free market economy. These extensions of the market have raised,