Titlebook: Crossing Fandoms; SuperWhoLock and the Paul Booth Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 fan.fandom.fan studies.doc

ODIUM

Culpable

, Fandom: The Fandom Business,oduces the concept of “fanqueue” culture, defined as fans’ sanctioned consumerism. Tying this to ., the chapter explores a tension in fandom between fan readings and corporate readings of fan cultures. That is, fans both are reliant upon and influence the larger corporate culture guiding fandom. The

MINT

, Fandom: Bigger on the Inside,events happen outside the boundaries of Creation’s stage, at the . fan convention, fan-events dominate. This chapter explores two aspects of fandom at the convention: LobbyCon, the unofficial mingling of guest and fan, and ribbon culture, the exchange of ribbons for badges. Much like . asks fans to

neutrophils

, Fandom: The Fandom Is Afoot,Sir Arthur Conan Doyle sits in an uneasy position between popular and high culture, and this chapter probes this tension through the lens of . as an example of fan hierarchies. This chapter ties the cultural hierarchies in . fandom to the economic and class hierarchies of the convention.

民間傳說

半身雕像

Book 2016nd analysis of fan texts, .Crossing Fandoms: SuperWhoLock and the Contemporary Fan Audience. also demonstrates how fan studies in the digital age can evolve to take into account changingfan activities and texts..

粗魯性質(zhì)

ith fans and analysis of fan texts, .Crossing Fandoms: SuperWhoLock and the Contemporary Fan Audience. also demonstrates how fan studies in the digital age can evolve to take into account changingfan activities and texts..978-1-137-57455-8

去才蔑視

metaphor for ongoing scholarship into contemporary fandom.?.What do you get when you cross the cult shows .Doctor Who., .Supernatural., and .Sherlock.? In this book, Paul Booth explores the fan-created crossover universe known as .SuperWhoLock.—a universe where Sherlock Holmes and Dean Winchester wo

黑豹

Visual-Field

C. C. Bernier,G. Bijiga,Y. L. Nene,R. Cousinnts an unusual case where the antagonism is neither completely directed . the text nor completely directed . the fandom. Rather, . antagonism emerges from the tension between the non-canon aspects of the corpus and the requisite fan experiences of the original three texts.