Titlebook: Critical Perspectives on J. M. Coetzee; Graham Huggan,Stephen Watson Book 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limi

conifer

Introduction VanZanten Gallagher’s . (1991) and, most recently, David Attwell’s . (1993). With the possible exception of Nadine Gordimer, there is no other South African author who is currently the subject of so many scholarly articles and dissertations.

incisive

媽媽不開心

The Hermeneutics of Empire: Coetzee’s Post-colonial Metafictionnialism is preemptive’ (‘Post, Post and Post’ 80). This is true if one understands the term in a literal or a strictly chronometric sense. Other interpretations of post-colonialism are possible, however. Stephen Slemon, for example, argues that.In Slemon’s terms, it is possible to treat South Africa as the site of such a counter-discourse.

Rustproof

疼死我了

Introductionave received over the last decade or so. Among others, he has been awarded Britain’s Booker-McConnell Prize, the Prix Fémina Etranger in France and the Jerusalem Prize in Israel. Already his work has been the subject of four book-length studies: Teresa Dovey’s . (1988), Dick Penner’s . (1989), Susan

實現(xiàn)

Colonialism and the Novels of J. M. Coetzeef a wider historical situation to do with colonialism, late colonialism, neo-colonialism’. At the same time, as if to underline his sense that South Africa’s situation was bound up with a global historical process, he added, ‘I’m suspicious of lines of division between a European context and a South

Organization

值得

Bridle

J. M. Coetzee: The Postmodern and the Postcolonial first, that it depends most on the appraisals of European and North American, rather than South African, critics; and second, that the European and American responses tend to obscure affinities both with his fiction and with the rest of his critical output, much of which has less to do with the nat

有發(fā)明天才