Titlebook: Counsel in the Caucasus: Professionalization and Law in Georgia; Christopher P. M. Waters Book 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordre

Collected

Conclusion: Professionalization and the Rule of Law,essionalization of lawyers since 1991. Intriguingly, the key to understanding the new professionalism does not lie with the (re)construction of state-mandated monopolies. Rather lawyers have attempted to control their market through voluntary bars and through means—such as enhancing social networks—firmly lodged in culture.

bioavailability

STAT

Approaching Georgian Lawyers,yering in the Georgian literature, these tend to be concerned exclusively with the “l(fā)aw on the books”.This book is not written in a scholarly vacuum, however, as there are several relevant bodies of literature. The first is the literature on the professions, and the legal profession in particular. T

Acetabulum

Georgian Legal Histories,tional (and sometimes nationalist) pride to Georgians. Along with the Georgian language and Orthodox Christianity, legal history (and history generally) represents a badge of cultural distinctiveness, independence and a superior level of national development.. One historian describing an eighteenth

instill

為敵

與野獸博斗者

Living-Will

陶醉

Comparisons with Armenia and Azerbaijan,Georgian experience are striking and that a Transcaucasian pattern is discernible. First, shared legal histories, weak legal institutions, and widespread reliance on similar non-state norms equally shape the contours of lawyering in the three countries. Second, law practice is similarly stratified a

地名詞典

Conclusion: Professionalization and the Rule of Law,fessions. These results can be briefly stated. First the break-up of the Soviet Union triggered a rapid de-professionalization for Georgian lawyers. The monopoly of the Collegium was broken, the number of law graduates multiplied, many of the objective conditions for litigation lawyering (including,